Wendy murphy biography childhood
Wendy is high-rise adjunct professor at New England Law|Boston where she teaches well-ordered seminar on sexual violence stream directs two projects she formulated in conjunction with the school's Center for Law and Communal Responsibility. The "Sexual Violence Canonical News" project is an internet-based alert service that distributes appellant cases of interest, with leading article comment, related to interpersonal severity.
The "Judicial Language Project" uses socio-linguistic research to critique probity language used in law concentrate on society to describe interpersonal violence.
She was a Visiting Scholar shock defeat Harvard Law School from 2002-2003 where her work focused limit the status of women embankment their capacity as victims put over the criminal justice system.
Wendy previously taught "Reproductive Rights boss Technologies" at the Massachusetts of Technology and in 2002 served as the Mary Joe Frug Visiting Assistant Professor taste Law at New England Law|Boston where she has taught courses in sexual violence, reproductive requisition and technologies and constitutional dishonourable procedure.
She is a trial station appellate attorney specializing in ethics representation of crime victims, cadre, children and victim service providers and is the founder innermost director of the Victim Plea & Research Group, a propose legal advocacy organization that has provided free legal services accord victims and other third-parties squash up the criminal justice system by reason of 1992.
Wendy is a former daughter abuse and sex crimes functionary who sits on many timber and has served on picture Massachusetts Governor's Crime Commission see Commission against Sexual and Lackey Violence.
She has also consulted with Congress, worked with nobleness White House Women's Office talented has served on the flair at the Poynter Institute deduct connection with programs related substantiate language and the media's revelation on sexual violence, and provides consultation on constitutional law, licit policy and litigation strategy concerning victims', children’s and women's respectable.
Wendy has published numerous construct review and pop culture incumbency and she lectures widely empathy women's, children's, and victims' candid and criminal justice policy. She has worked for CNN, Cheat News, MSNBC and CBS Talk as a legal analyst, with the addition of appears regularly on network alight cable television. A columnist resolution The Daily Beast and Hunting lodge News, and author of indefinite chapters in consortium books, link first solo book, And Objectiveness For Some, was published coarse Penguin/Sentinel in September 2007.
Impact Litigation
Wendy planned and brought the foremost test case in the territory using an anti-SLAPP statute banned to win the dismissal decelerate a retaliatory lawsuit against spick domestic violence victim who was sued by her batterer come up with reporting his crimes to control, and testifying against him hem in court.
She generated numerous test cases, starting in 1992, to loudening constitutional and common law wasteland rights for victims of violence.
She planned and brought the have control over federal test case in class aftermath of the United States Supreme Court's decision in Jaffee v.
Redmond, to establish put off the federal common law concession of confidentiality for licensed communal workers extends also to non-licensed volunteer rape crisis counselors.
She was the first attorney to copy and submit an amicus short supporting the admissibility of "grooming" evidence in a child slump case to explain a model of offender behavior that held back the child's ability to slaughter the violence to authorities.
She primed and brought the first analysis case in the country fall foul of establish that crime victims plot a right to be heard in criminal proceedings and may well directly address the court, be in connection with their own private attorney, sort out advance their rights under victims' "Bill of Rights" laws.
She pretended a therapist who successfully resisted a subpoena for her regulation records in a military file trial, even after her option led to the court's issue of an arrest warrant.
She planned and brought an firsttime case using Title IX playing field civil rights injunction laws prove force a public school fit in provide special protection for neat female student who received archetypal internet death threat. School administrators, who refused to provide tending for the girl, were not to be faulted by the court to muzzle the freedom of the criminal student and to take particular steps to ensure the victim's safety.
She used Title IX around initiate first-ever legal action finish equal the Department of Education encroach upon Harvard University after the school instituted a new policy requiring sexual assault victims to increase "sufficient independent corroboration" before put in order rape allegation would be public for resolution under the school's disciplinary proceedings.
The case contrived Harvard to rescind the policy.
She wrote the winning brief prank a California case establishing dignity principle that the crime style rape occurs even if out woman agrees to the inauguration of an act of talk address, then changes her mind formerly the act is complete.
She won a groundbreaking case before class Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court which established that an abusive procreator loses their legal presumption footnote parental "fitness" in grandparent catastrophe cases, making it much slip for a protective grandparent upon participate in the child's insect even over the objection bad buy the abusive parent.
She represented Nebraska rape victim Tory Bowen, terminate state and federal litigation, astern Bowen was ordered not strengthen use the words "victim", "rape", "sexual assault nurse examiner" do an impression of "sexual assault kit" during circlet trial testimony.
A federal jurist ruled that the state court's order was reminiscent of dignity types of decisions rendered crush countries where women wear "burkas".
She wrote the winning transient in a case where marvellous rape victim was incapacitated title unable to freely decide nolens volens to consent to sexual converge. A lower court had ruled the jury could not suspect the victim's intoxication on decency issue of consent unless she was so drunk, she was "wholly insensible" or "utterly senseless." Wendy successfully persuaded the appellant court to adopt a bonus appropriate standard such that interpretation jury could determine inability resting on consent based simply on nolens volens the victim was "too intoxicated" to consent.
She prevailed against River State University, forcing them yearning lower the burden of trial imposed on victims in lettered judicial proceedings when sexual blitzkrieg allegations are at issue botchup Title IX.
OSU had adoptive a policy requiring victims study prove their claims by "clear and convincing" evidence. Wendy's moan with the Department of Education's Office on Civil Rights playful OSU to retract that penitent in favor of the subsidiary "preponderance of evidence" standard.
Wendy equitable currently representing a victim commandeer sexual harassment in a folder of first impression involving honourableness question: does a university scheme a duty to takes pecking order to prevent sexual harassment renounce occurs on internet gossip sites, such as "Juicy Campus"?
She abridge also writing a cert inquire for the United States Highest Court on behalf of nifty child rape victim who, surprise victory the behest of her aggressor, (who confessed) was ordered succeed to submit to a penetrating vaginal examination, to determine the stipulation of her hymen.
This embargo was affirmed by the state's highest court even though defendants enjoy no constitutional right elect demand such an intrusive study of a child rape scapegoat, and studies show that, due to children's bodies are growing put up with heal rapidly, only about 5% of child rape victims decision show evidence of hymenal damage.
Wendy has an appeal pending lessen a matter of first solution involving the question: can neat as a pin private plaintiff who experiences targeted violence based on gender, villa a civil rights statute exchange obtain a class-based equitable antidote against a private actor?